Comparison
| AISA Eagle has up to 1024 spatial pixel which, is double the amount of pixels AISA+ carries. This raise in pixels creates a number of advantages for the user;
|
 Wider swath width |
| The major advantage of AISA Eagle to AISA+ is (if you assume all the variables are the same) that AISA Eagle can achieve the same ground resolution as AISA+ with double the swath width. Increasing the height of the aircraft or extending the FOV via adapting the optics achieves this. |
| Flexible flying height |
| AISA Eagle can increase its altitude by 100% before its ground resolution will drop below that of AISA+, which allows more operational flexibility. (See illustration)
|
| Increased flight path coverage |
| 50% fewer flight lines are required to cover a multiple line flight block when using AISA Eagle in comparison to AISA+
|
| Reduced acquisition time |
| Savings in flight time will vary according to the specifics of the mission however generally when the variable factors are kept the same it is possible to reduce the acquisition time by over 50%. The table below shows some estimated calculations of the time saved by AISA Eagle in comparison to AISA+. |
